Chism et al v. Life Strategies of Arkansas LLC
| Thelma Chism and Nathan Williams |
| Life Strategies of Arkansas LLC |
| 3:2009cv00225 |
| December 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Crittenden |
| James M. Moody |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
41
JUDGMENT, pursuant to 40 Order entered this date, the Court dismisses the Plaintiffs' first amended complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/14/2011. (jct)
|
|
Filing
18
CONSENT ORDER Conditionally Certifying Case as FLSA Collective Action directing Defendant to provide Plaintiffs' counsel, within 10 days of the entry of this Consent Order, a list of names, last known addresses & telephone numbers for all LSA employees referenced. Plaintiffs will mail the court approved Notice on 4/2/10, & the opt-in period will run until 6/16/10. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 3/17/10. (jct)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER denying without prejudice 6 Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 2/1/2010. (jct)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing the Clerk to strike 9 Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Plaintiffs may file a motion for leave to amend. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 1/27/10. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
