Flenoy v. Soward et al
| Brad Flenoy |
| Peggy Soward, Ernest McKay, Dale Cook, Luther Whitfield, John Thrasher and Kenneth Melvin |
| 3:2012cv00071 |
| March 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jonesboro Office |
| Mississippi |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
39
ORDER directing Plaintiff to file a response to 36 Defendants' MOTION for Summary Judgment and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts that complies with Fed R. Civ. P. 56, Local Rule 56.1, and the instructions set forth in this Order. Furth er, Plaintiff is advised that failure to timely and properly comply with this Order will result in all of the facts set forth in Defendants summary judgment being deemed admitted by Plaintiff or the dismissal of this action without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 1/8/2013. (jak)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER, pursuant to 11 Answer, directing the Clerk to correctly identify Defendants Peggy Soward, John Thrasher, Kenneth Melvin, Ernest McKay, Dale Cook & Luther Whitfield. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/26/2012. (jct)
|
|
Filing
12
INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER that the parties shall complete discovery on or before 10/20/2012, & file any dispositive motions on or before 11/20/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/24/2012. (jct)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
