Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Cherch v. Johnson (INMATE 1)
as 2:2026cv00421
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Melvin Cherch
Defendant:
Mandy Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherch v. Booth (INMATE 2)
as 2:2026cv00298
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Melvin Cherch
Defendant:
Joy Pace Booth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00292
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cherch v. Woods et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2025cv00445
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Melvin Cherch
Defendant:
J. Woods, M. Eller, Corporal Crumpton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MELVIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv61353
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MELVIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Victor Lemar Edwards v. Sheriff Dale Cook, et al
as 15-2668
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Victor Lemar Edwards
Defendant:
Lieutenant Luther Whitfield, Mississippi County Detention Center, Deputy Octavious Bailey, Mississippi County Jail, Deputy Alonzo Cummings, Mississippi County Jail and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sheriff Dale Cook, Mississippi County Detention Center and Major Harris, Mississippi County Detention Center
United States v. Kenneth Melvin Vinson
as 15-1363
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Kenneth Melvin Vinson
STERLING v. DUNN et al
as 3:2014cv00040
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MELVIN STERLING, III
Defendant:
SHALAMAR DUNN and CLARKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STERLING v. NEWLAND
as 3:2013cv00149
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MELVIN STERLING, III
Defendant:
REED NEWLAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
