Ag Resource Management LLC v. Southern Bank
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|July 7, 2017
JUDGMENT consistent with 52 Opinion and Order it is considered, ordered, and adjudged that Plaintiff's 32 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is granted. Judgment is entered in favor of AG Resource Management LLC against Southern Bank for th e sum of $119,397.32, plus prejudgment interest of $11,633.36, together with post-judgment interest at the rate of 1.22% per annum until paid, along with Plaintiff's costs of $400 for the filing fee and $50 for the ser vice fee, for all or which execution may issue. It is further ordered and adjudged that Defendant's 38 Cross Motion for Summary Judgment is granted in part and denied in part. Count II of the complaint is dismissed because the claim for common law conversion has been displaced by the Uniform Commercial Code. The remainder of the Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 7/7/2017. (jak)
|June 26, 2017
ORDER: Southern Bank filed a third-party complaint against B.C. Farms, LLC, and Boddy G. Clause. The Clerk of Court listed the first name of Mr. Clause on the docket as Bobby rather than Boddy. The Court directs the Clerk to correct the docket to reflect that Mr. Clause's first name is Boddy. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/26/2017. (jak)
|May 19, 2017
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/19/2017. (jak)
|December 12, 2016
ORDER denying 6 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 12/12/2016. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?