Cases 1 - 10 of 129
Great Southern Bank v. Fiserv Solutions, LLC
as 6:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Great Southern Bank
Defendant:
Fiserv Solutions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00418
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Copple v. Southern Bank of Tennessee
as 3:2022cv00692
Plaintiff:
George E. Copple
Defendant:
Southern Bank of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv02597
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Abdulla v. Southern Bank et al
as 1:2021cv00099
Plaintiff:
Sohail M. Abdulla
Defendant:
Sardis Bankshares, Inc. and Southern Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mays v. Morgan et al
as 4:2019cv00079
Defendant:
J. Gray Morgan, Southern Bank and Trust Company and Affiliated Mortgage Services
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Morris Jeffrey Mays
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
C.W. Matthews Contracting Co., Inc. v. The Southern Bank Company et al
as 1:2018cv00506
Plaintiff:
C.W. Matthews Contracting Co., Inc.
Defendant:
The Southern Bank Company and Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Co.
Counter_claimant:
The Southern Bank Company
Counter_defendant:
C.W. Matthews Contracting Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Engel v. Southern Bank
as 3:2017cv05162
Plaintiff:
Noel J. P. Engel
Defendant:
Southern Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bunn v. Great Southern Bank
as 4:2017cv04171
Plaintiff:
James R. Bunn
Defendant:
Great Southern Bank
Intervenor_defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Valley Bank, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330
Thomas v. First Southern Bank et al
as 5:2017cv00023
Plaintiff:
R.D. Thomas, Jr.
Defendant:
First Southern Bank , Lynn Schroeder and William "Bill" Hughes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
