Smith v. E&S Contracting Inc et al
||E&S Contracting Inc, Coastal Drilling East LLC and Mark McDaniels
||January 5, 2017
||US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
||Kristine G. Baker
|Nature of Suit:
|Cause of Action:
||28 U.S.C. § 1441
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|August 28, 2017
ORDER in accordance with Mr. Mross and Mr. Smith's stipulations, the Court dismisses this action with prejudice. The Court denies as moot all pending motions. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/28/2017.(jak)
|February 16, 2017
ORDER granting 17 Motion to Consolidate Cases. This action is consolidated with Elton Smith v. E&S Contracting Inc., et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-00005 KGB. All parties are directed to make filings only in Jerry Mross v. E&S Contracting Inc., et al., Cas e No. 3:16-cv-00223 KGB, going forward. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file a copy of this Order in Elton Smith v. E&S Contracting, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:17-cv-00005-KGB. At this stage of the litigation, the Court determines that it would b e premature to determine that separate trials are necessary or appropriate. On a more fully developed record, the parties, if they choose to do so, may request that the Court reconsider this issue. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 2/16/2017. (jak)
|January 17, 2017
ORDER directing the Clerk to reassign this related case to the Honorable Kristine G. Baker, who has agreed to handle both cases to promote judicial efficiency. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 1/17/2017. (jak)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?