Chandler v. Marshall et al
| Steven Chandler |
| Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and Cagel |
| 3:2022cv00164 |
| July 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 4 JUDGMENT: Chandler's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/15/2022. (jak) |
Filing 3
ORDER withdrawing the reference. Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/15/2022. (jak)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing plaintiff to submit either the $402 statutory filing fee or an in forma pauperis motion within 30 days of the entry date of this Order. The Clerk is directed to send to Plaintiff an in forma pauperis motion, together with the filing fee calculation sheet. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 7/7/2022. (jak)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Steven Chandler.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
