Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Horne v. Jones
as 24-11027
Defendant:
Judge Robert Jones, also known as Bob Jones, Justice of the Peace Precinct 2 and Tyler Cagel, Assistant District Attorney
Plaintiff:
Steve Van Horne
Horne v. Jones
as 23-10593
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Steve Van Horne
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Robert Jones, also known as Bob Jones, Tyler Cagel, Assistant District Attorney and Justice of the Peace Precinct 2
Van Horne v. Jones et al
as 1:2023cv00017
Defendant:
Judge Robert Jones, Bob Jones, Tyler Cagel and others
Plaintiff:
Steve Van Horne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thomas v. Cagel
as 23-10045
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lorenzo Allen Thomas
Defendant / Appellee:
Micheal Cagel and David Hafer
Gilliland v. Buckner et al
as 2:2022cv02230
Plaintiff:
Cory Gilliland
Defendant:
. Buckner, Andrew Killian, Lance Cagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Davison et al
as 3:2022cv00160
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Defendant:
Davison, Tyler Robinson, Cagel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Addison v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Tristin Addison
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00164
Plaintiff:
Steven Chandler
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anderson v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00162
Plaintiff:
Clarence Anderson
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Ron Hunter, Regina Hindman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
