Ward v. Copenhaver et al
| Stephen Ward |
| Harold Copenhaver, Larry Rogers, Jeffrey Moore, Wannda Turner, Lisa Trevathan, Kimberly Randall, Melissa Kathryn Morrison, Simrit Kaur, Stan Morris and Bill Campbell |
| 3:2022cv00250 |
| September 26, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ERRATA to First Amended Complaint by Stephen Ward. (wbb) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Amend #2 Complaint filed by Stephen Ward. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Amended Complaint)(wbb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #3 MOTION for Interlocutory Decision. CORRECTION: The original document was submitted in error (missing signature). The correct document was added to docket entry #3 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
| Filing 3 APPLICATION for an Interlocutory Decision filed by Stephen Ward. (wbb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/3/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct (submitted 10/3/2022)) (jak). |
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT for Damages with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Stephen Ward. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(wbb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Stephen Ward. (wbb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
