Cases 1 - 10 of 47
ROGERS v. RICK et al
as 3:2023cv24697
Plaintiff:
LARRY ROGERS
Defendant:
C RICK, PAUL LEVINS and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ward v. Copenhaver et al
as 3:2022cv00250
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ward
Defendant:
Harold Copenhaver, Larry Rogers, Jeffrey Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Maria Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04991
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00777
Plaintiff:
Magliocchini, Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Magliocchini et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00777
Plaintiff:
Steven Sharamitaro, Maria Magliocchini, Christie Magnus and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Baisden v. Correctional Officer assigned to 'B' Dorm (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01080
Defendant:
Correctional Officer assigned to 'B' Dorm
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Baisden, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rothi v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 0:2019cv62661
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Rothi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rothi v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 3:2019cv01207
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Rothi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Baisden v. Bolling (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00291
Plaintiff:
Larry Roger Baisden, II
Defendant:
Kilby Correctional Facility, Leon Bolling, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv00008
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
