Smith v. Armstrong et al
| Dakota Smith |
| Sheila K Armstrong, Ashely Wells, Billy Codwell and Smith |
| 3:2023cv00096 |
| April 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Patricia S Harris |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Dakota Smith. (kdr) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff's custodian is directed to collect monthly payments from his institutional account and forward them to the Clerk of Court until a total of $350 has been paid. The Clerk is directed to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Grimes Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office. Smith is directed to amend his complaint within 30 days from the date of this Order. The Clerk of Court is directed to send a blank 1983 complaint form to Smith. In the event he fails to file an amended complaint conforming to this order by that date, this case may be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 5/1/2023. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Dakota Smith. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Dakota Smith. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
