Burgie v. Hannah et al
| Eric C Burgie |
| Jim R Hannah, Donald L Corbin, Annabelle Clinton Imber, Paul E Danielson, Jim Gunter, Robert L Brown and Elana Willis |
| 4:2009cv00920 |
| December 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Jefferson |
| G. Thomas Eisele |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
66
MEMORANDUM OPINION and Order 52 Motion for Extension of Time is Denied as Moot; [54 56 Motions to Compel are Denied; 43 Motion For Summary Judgment by Defendant Newbery is Granted; 64 Motion for Leave to Appeal In Forma Pauperis is held in abeyance. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 8/12/10. (dac)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER denying 49 Motion to Clarify and advising plaintiff that he must file any opposition he has to the summary judgment motion by July 23, 2010. Signed by Judge G. Thomas Eisele on 7/12/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER denying pltf's 35 Motion to Amend and 36 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 6/14/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
30
ORDER re 25 MOTION for Discovery filed by Eric C Burgie. This is actually a request for discovery and should be re-docketed as such. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 4/13/10. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
