Jackson v. Pulaski County et al
| Cornell Jackson |
| Bangs, Oneal, Pulaski County and Mundy |
| 4:2011cv00468 |
| June 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| James M. Moody |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT re 26 Order Dismissing Case without prejudice and certifying that an ifp appeal would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 10/18/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Partial Report and Recommendations and dismissing deft Pulaski County without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Clerk is directed to prepare a summons for defts Bangs, Oneal, and Mundy, a nd the U.S. Marshal is directed to serve the summons, Complaint, Amended Complaint, and this Order on them without prepayment of fees. The Court certifies that an ifp appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody on 8/8/11. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER directing the Clerk to send to plaintiff an ifp application along with a prison calculation sheet, and directing plaintiff to file the ifp application or to pay the $350 statutory filing fee within 30 days of entry of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 6/21/11. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
