Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv07132
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Adrian Moon v. Jill Boddie, et al
as 26-5169
Plaintiff:
Adrian Damico Moon
Defendant:
Jill Christie Boddie, Satan, Tanya S. Chutkan and others
Hammond v. Si-Hyuk et al
as 8:2026cv01359
Defendant:
Hybe Co., Bang Si-Hyuk, Big Hit Entertainment Co. Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Cori Hammond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Bang Bang Merchandise LLP v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2026cv04025
Plaintiff:
Bang Bang Merchandise LLP
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A, Gokal Ramu doing business as Jai Sree Ram, lileinvzhuang and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Hammond et al v. Hybe Co., LTD et al
as 8:2026cv00943
Plaintiff:
Cori Carol Hammond
Defendant:
Hybe Co., LTD, Samsung Electronics Co., LTD., Netflix, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bang Bang Merchandise LLP v. THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
as 1:2026cv03580
Plaintiff:
Bang Bang Merchandise LLP
Defendant:
THE PARTNERSHIPS AND UNINCORPORATED ASSOCIATIONS IDENTIFIED ON SCHEDULE A
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44 Trademark Infringement
Devine v. Bang & Olufsen A/S et al
as 1:2026cv02260
Plaintiff:
Christopher James Devine
Defendant:
Bang & Olufsen A/S and Bang & Olufsen America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00802
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
MOON v. BANG
as 1:2026cv00771
Plaintiff:
ADRIAN DAMICO MOON
Defendant:
DIANE BANG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
