Escobar v. Cross et al
| Luis Estuardo Escobar |
| J Cross, Smiley, Foot and Lipscomb |
| 4:2012cv00023 |
| January 12, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Hot Spring |
| Brian S. Miller |
| Joe J. Volpe |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
JUDGMENT: Consistent with the 20 Order that was entered on this day, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice; and the Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Judgment and accompanying Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 2/27/2013. (srw)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER ADOPTING 8 Partial Report and Recommendations; dismissing pltf's claims for monetary damages from defts in their official capacities; and dismissing deft Capt. Foot as a deft in this action. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 7/9/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER finding service is appropriate for Defendants J. Cross, Smiley, and Lipscomb; directing the Clerk of the Court to prepare summons for Defendants; and directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of 2 Plaintiff's Complaint and summons on Defendants without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefore. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 6/12/2012. (srw)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
