Cases 1 - 10 of 100
WEST v. RADIO ONE et al
as 1:2026cv01218
Plaintiff:
GLENDA M. WEST
Defendant:
RADIO ONE and RICKEY SMILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. State of California, et al.
as 26-3536
Plaintiff:
JAMES LA VELL HARRIS and Smiley James Harris
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OF LAKE and LAKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Werling et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04533
Plaintiff:
Zachary Werling, Ethan Lamothe, Dora Smiley and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smiley Face Dental, P.C. et al v. EverBank, N.A.
as 1:2026cv02883
Plaintiff:
Smiley Face Dental, P.C. and Julia Nosov
Defendant:
EverBank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Roberts et al v. Google LLC
as 4:2026cv04436
Plaintiff:
Tommie Roberts, Jr., Nate De La Hoya-Reynoso, Zach Rose and others
Defendant:
Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMILEY v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 2:2026cv03186
Plaintiff:
STEVEN SMILEY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK, INC and NOVO NORDISK A/S
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smiley v. Stevens
as 2:2026cv00824
Petitioner:
Mr. Eric Smiley
Respondent:
Warden Christopher Stevens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smiley v. SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
as 6:2026cv00208
Plaintiff:
George Smiley
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Phillips v. Centruion Health of IN et al
as 3:2026cv00574
Plaintiff:
Clayton Duane Phillips
Defendant:
Centurion Health of IN, Jamar Thompson, Roberson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar et al v. GOOGLE LLC
as 4:2026cv03511
Plaintiff:
Philippe Gillon Aguilar, Alex Coogan, Amanda miller and others
Defendant:
GOOGLE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.