Williams v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Plaintiff:
Whitnei Williams
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Correction and John Maples
Case Number:
4:2013cv00152
Filed:
March 15, 2013
Court:
Arkansas Eastern District Court
Office:
Little Rock Office
County:
White
Presiding Judge:
J. Leon Holmes
Nature of Suit:
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment
Cause of Action:
42:1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| January 20, 2015 | 42 |
ORDER OF DISMISSAL: Having been notified that a settlement has been reached in this matter, the Court finds that this case should be dismissed. The complaint and all claims in this action against defendants are hereby dismissed. The Court retains complete jurisdiction for 90 days to vacate this Order and to reopen the action if it is satisfactorily shown that settlement has not been completed and further litigation is necessary. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/20/2015. (ks)
|
| January 14, 2014 | 26 |
ORDER denying as moot Defendants' 17 motion to dismiss and granting plaintiff's 22 second motion to amend. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/14/2014. (ks)
|
| January 7, 2014 | 24 |
ORDER lifting stay effective on the 61st day after 9/24/2013. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 1/7/2014. (ks)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
