Nelson et al v. Banks et al
| Tanza Nelson and Helen Edwards |
| Jimmy Banks and Arkansas Department of Correction |
| 4:2015cv00605 |
| September 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Pulaski |
| Kristine G. Baker |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
68
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to 67 Opinion and Order, the Court grants 46 defendants' motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff Tanza Nelson's claims are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/30/2018. (cmn)
|
|
Filing
41
OPINION AND ORDER granting Warden Banks and the ADC's 32 motion for summary judgment on the claims of separate plaintiff Helen Edwards. Ms. Edwards' claims against Warden Banks and the ADC are dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 11/22/2016. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
38
OPINION AND ORDER denying 5 motion for partial summary judgment; granting in part and denying in part 6 motion to dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 12 motion to dismiss; granting in part and denying in part 15 motion to strike; and denying the "alternative" motion to remand contained in Ms. Nelson's 20 response to defendants' motion to dismiss and motion to strike. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 09/28/2016. (rhm)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
