Reyes v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Plaintiff: Froilan Reyes
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Correction, Pulaski County Jail, David B Warren and Harvey L Berance
Case Number: 4:2017cv00762
Filed: November 17, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Office: Little Rock Office
County: Izard
Presiding Judge: Patricia S. Harris
Presiding Judge: D. P. Marshall
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 24, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 132 JUDGMENT: Reyes's Eighth Amendment claim that Rohder failed to refer him to an optometrist is dismissed with prejudice. Reyes' s claims against Bland and Griswold are dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. All other claims are dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 6/24/2020. (jbh)
August 16, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 113 ORDER adopting 111 Partial Recommendation and overruling 112 objections. 100 Motion for summary judgment is granted. Reyes's claims against him are dismissed without prejudice. 97 Motion for summary judgment is partly granted and partly denied. Reyes's claim that Rohder wouldn't refer him to an optometrist goes forward. His remaining claims against Rohder are dismissed without prejudice. 112 Embedded motion for appointed counsel is denied without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 8/16/2019. (jak)
February 8, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 95 ORDER adopting 84 Partial Recommendation. 50 Motion for summary judgment is denied without prejudice. 65 Motion to dismiss is granted; and Reyes's claims against Bland and Griswold are dismissed with prejudice. Reyes's claims against Johnson and Law are dismissed without prejudice. 68 and 78 Motions are denied as moot. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/8/2019. (jak)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Reyes v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Froilan Reyes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Arkansas Department of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pulaski County Jail
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: David B Warren
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Harvey L Berance
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?