Jackson v. Ryals et al
| Cedric Jackson |
| Tim Ryals, Gary Stewart, Randell, Huffman and Gary Andrews |
| 4:2017cv00769 |
| November 20, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Little Rock Office |
| Faulkner |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
JUDGMENT: Based on 41 Order entered today, this case is dismissed and all relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 2/25/2019. (ljb)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER approving and adopting in its entirety 15 Recommendation as my findings in all respects; allowing Jackson to proceed with his claims against Ryals, Randell, Andrews and Stewart, in their individual and official capacities, for subjecting him to unconstitutional conditions of confinement due to overcrowding and for failing to provide any mental health care for his resulting psychological injuries; directing the Clerk to prepare summons for each of them and the United States Marshal to ser ve the summons, 9 substituted complaint, 10 supplement to substituted complaint, and this order on them without prepayment of fees and costs or security; dismissing Huffman without prejudice as a defendant in this action; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal of these rulings would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/5/2018. (ljb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
