Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Allen v. Sanyang et al
as 2:2026cv01630
Defendant:
K. Morrow, Kelly Blakeman, M. May and others
Plaintiff:
Ryan Allen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Forest River, Inc.
as 26-3238
Defendant:
FOREST RIVER, INC.
Plaintiff:
DONNA LORRAINE HUFFMAN
Breland v. Huffman et al
as 1:2026cv00338
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Burl Cain and Brand Huffman
Plaintiff:
David Breland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUFFMAN CONTRACTORS INC v. ADMIRAL INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 4:2026cv00580
Defendant:
EMPLOYERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, SOUTHERN-OWNERS INSURANCE COMPANY, CAN FINANCIAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff:
HUFFMAN CONTRACTORS INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02325
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Magee v. Huffman
as 26-60948
Respondent:
Brand Huffman, Superintendent, South Mississippi Correctional Institution
Petitioner:
Kendall K. Magee
Cherresa Baker v. Tim Ryals, et al
as 26-3162
Plaintiff:
Cherresa Kay Baker
Defendant:
Tim Ryals, Sheriff, Faulkner County, Scott Huffman, Jail Administrator, Faulkner County Detention Center and Lacretia Flowers, Lt.
Doe et al v. Ruiz Palacios et al
as 8:2026cv00639
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jennifer Martin
Defendant:
Martha Ruiz Palacios, Katrina Juleen Fewkes, Mark Labouchardiere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv03564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
