Sims v. Thayor et al
| Harold Shawgnessy Sims |
| Tammy Hubble, Scott Elington, Garr, Brent Davice, Cinthia Thayor, James Teage, F Garry, Does Judges' Court Staff, Jason Alen and Craighead County Sheriff's Department |
| 4:2018cv00652 |
| September 10, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #11 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office (lack of signature on file mark). The correct document was added to docket entry #11 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF APPEAL as to #8 Order and #9 Judgment by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cmn) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Appeal in forma pauperis by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cmn) (Additional attachment(s) added on 11/7/2018: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak). |
| Filing 10 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (cmn) |
Filing 9
JUDGMENT: Consistent with #8 Order, this case is dismissed, without prejudice. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/29/2018. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER approving and adopting #6 Recommended Disposition in its entirety as this Court's findings in all respects; dismissing, without prejudice, this case for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; counting dismissal as a "strike"; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 10/29/2018. (cmn)
|
| Filing 7 OBJECTION to #6 Report and Recommendations by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (kdr) |
|
Filing 6
RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending plaintiff's #1 Complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to state a claim on which relief may be granted; dismissal constitute a "strike" and the Court certify that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting this Recommendation would not be taken in good faith; Objections due within 14 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/27/18. (tjb)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be collected from Plaintiff's institution account, until a total of $350 has been paid to the Clerk of Court; and directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Craighead County Detention Center. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/20/2018. (kdr)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Filing Calculation of Initial Payment of Filing Fee by Harold Shawgnessy Sims. (cel) |
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS directing Plaintiff to either pay the $400 filing fee or file an IFP motion, on or before 10/12/2018; and directing the clerk to send him an IFP application along with a prison calculation sheet. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/12/2018. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER OF REFERRAL referring the above-styled case to Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray for further proceedings and recommendation. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 9/12/2018. (cmn)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Harold Shawgnessy Sims.(kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
