Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Garr v. ERMI, LLC
as 1:2026cv03173
Plaintiff:
Edward Garr
Defendant:
ERMI, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Ballenger v. Doe et al
as 3:2026cv00236
Plaintiff:
William Julius Ballenger
Defendant:
Nurse Jane Doe, Srg. C. Blake, Srg. B. Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ragland v. Strada et al
as 1:2026cv01004
Plaintiff:
James Cleo Ragland
Defendant:
Frank Strada, Stanton Heidle, Warden, Phyllis Isabell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garr' Dena v. Tayman
as 4:2025cv09030
Plaintiff:
Jayvion T. Garr' Dena
Defendant:
Tayman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garr v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 0:2025cv61875
Plaintiff:
Keith Garr
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv02050
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bowens et al v. 3M COMPANY, f/k/a Minesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11916
Plaintiff:
Monte Bowens, Thomas Buenger, Shirleen Clarke and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemical Americas Inc., Arkema Inc, BASF Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Barron v. Richardson et al
as 3:2025cv00171
Plaintiff:
Deursla Lashay Barron
Defendant:
Ron Richardson and Charless Garr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Charlotte Franklin v. University of Cincinnati Drake Hospital, et al
as 25-3559
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE FRANKLIN, Queen
Defendant:
UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI DRAKE HOSPITAL, CHRISTIAN CARE NURSING, UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI HOSPITAL and others
GARR v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv01108
Plaintiff:
ANGELITA GARR
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN COMPANY LLC and PHARMACIA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
