King v. Woods et al
Plaintiff: Michael Ray King
Defendant: Adams, Corman and Laffett Woods, Jr
Case Number: 4:2020cv00333
Filed: March 25, 2020
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: Kristine G Baker
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 18, 2020 Filing 9 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael Ray King re #8 Proposed Findings and Recommendations. (fjg)
May 12, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 8 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Plaintiff's complaint be dismissed without prejudice and that the Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any order adopting this recommendation and the accompanying judgment would not be taken in good faith #1 . Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 5/12/2020. (lej)
April 24, 2020 Filing 7 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael Ray King re #5 Order. (fjg)
April 21, 2020 Filing 6 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael Ray King re #1 Complaint. (fjg)
April 13, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER directing Plaintiff to comply with LR 5.5(c)(2) within 30 days of the date of this order or dismissal of this case will be recommended. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/13/2020. (lej)
April 13, 2020 Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Michael Ray King re #2 Addendum, #3 Order. (jbh)
April 2, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER that Plaintiff must submit either the $400 filing fee or a complete Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit within 30 days of the date of this order. His failure to do one or the other will result in the dismissal of this case without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 4/2/2020. (lej)
April 2, 2020 Filing 2 ADDENDUM to #1 Complaint filed by Michael Ray King. (kdr)
March 25, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Michael Ray King. (ljb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: King v. Woods et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Adams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Corman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Laffett Woods, Jr
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Ray King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?