Kimery v. Payne et al
| Fielding Vaughn Kimery |
| Dexter Payne, Roy Griffin, Marshal Reed, Lorrennta Smith, James Gibson, Ned Butler, Joseph Bivens, Brandon Carroll and Raymon Naylor |
| 4:2021cv00209 |
| March 16, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Jerome T Kearney |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
NOTICE by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Copies by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (ljb)
|
|
Filing 12
MOTION for Service by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER denying as moot #9 second motion for extension of time to file objections. Mr. Kimery may file any objections to Judge Kearney's Proposed Findings and Recommendations up to and including 05/31/2021. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 05/04/2021. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 10
ADDENDUM to #9 Notice of Motion for Extension of Time filed by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (llg)
|
|
Filing 9
NOTICE of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #6 PROPOSED FINDNGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (llg)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER granting #7 motion for extension of time to file objections. Mr. Kimery may file any objections to Judge Kearney's #6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations up to and including 5/31/2021. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 4/28/2021. (jbh)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION for Extension of Time to File Objections to #6 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (llg)
|
|
Filing 6
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #5 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint against Defendants be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. This dismissal be considered a "strike" within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. The Court certifies that an in forma pauperis appeal from an Order and Judgmentdismissing this action will not be taken in good faith. Objections are due no later than 14 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 04/19/2021. (lmc)
|
|
Filing 5
AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (llg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #3 Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; and directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the ADC Compliance Office, the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the Warden of the Varner Super Max Unit. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 03/29/2021. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 3
MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing Kimery to submit either the $402 filing fee or an In Forma Pauperis Motion, within 30 days of the entry date of this Order; directing Plaintiff to file an Amended Complaint using the enclosed 1983 complaint form within 30 days of the date of this Order; and directing the Clerk to send to Plaintiff an In Forma Pauperis Motion, together with the filing calculation sheet, and a 1983 complaint form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 03/22/2021. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Fielding Vaughn Kimery. (llg)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
