Smith v. Payne
| Daniel Smith |
| Dexter Payne |
| 4:2021cv00794 |
| September 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| D P Marshall |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
NOTICE re #12 Order by Daniel Smith. (llg)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER directing Petitioner Williams to file a Response to #10 Motion to Dismiss on or before 11/20/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/20/2021. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 11
BRIEF IN SUPPORT re #10 Motion to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Dexter Payne. (Harris, Christian)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to Dismiss Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Dexter Payne (Harris, Christian)
|
|
Filing 9
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #8 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Kristine G. Baker. (cmn)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER: I was serving on the Arkansas Court of Appeals when Smith's direct appeal was pending in that Court. I therefore recuse. The Clerk must reassign this case at random by chip exchange. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 10/12/2021. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 7
NOTICE of Appearance by Christian Scholfield Harris on behalf of Dexter Payne (Harris, Christian)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting in part #5 Motion for Status. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/24/2021. (csf)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for Status by Daniel Smith. (llg)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER #1 directing the Clerk of the Court to serve by mail a copy of #1 Petition and this Order on the Respondent and the Arkansas Attorney General; and directing the Respondent to file an answer, motion, or other response within 21 days of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 9/23/2021. (kdr)
|
|
Filing 3
Filing fee: $ 5.00 Received, receipt number LIT083779. (mdo)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER directing the Clerk of the Court to send Smith an Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (Form AO-240); and directing Smith, if he wishes to continue with this action, to either (1) file the completed Application, including the Certificate of Prisoner Accounts, or (2) pay the $5.00 filing fee in full, on or before 10/08/2021. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 09/08/2021. (ajt)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Daniel Smith. (Filing Fee not submitted, Motion to Proceed IFP not filed)(jak)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Smith v. Payne | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daniel Smith | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Dexter Payne | |
| Represented By: | Christian Scholfield Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
