Hill v. Spears et al
Jessie Hill |
John H Spears, James E Shipman, Claudia M Harris, Dock Christopher King, Ashley King, Mary Mena, D Brewer, Justin Barbee-Smith, David A Marter, Raymond Naylor, William Straughn, Dexter Payne, Marshall Dale Reed, Patti Anne Conley, John Stevenson, William F Straughn, Jasmine D Saih, L Goodlow, Kearney, J Slayden, Amminnica Gardner, Janice Blake, Lanika Cooksey, Rory L Griffin, LaSonya Rochelle Scott, Cadijah Jackson, Maurice Culclager, Shelby Houston, Cantrel Bass, J Sundine, Azaria Nicole White, Moon, Antonio D Johnson, Jr, Bannister, Byers, W Freeman, Doc Christopher King, Cantrell Bass, William Freeman, IV and Cook |
4:2022cv00489 |
May 24, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jerome T Kearney |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #8 Notice. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to indicate the document was filed in error (wrong case) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. (jak) |
Filing 8 DOCKET ENTRY FILED IN ERROR - DISREGARD.(kdr) (Docket text modified on 7/6/2022 to indicate the document was filed in error)(jak) |
Filing 7 OBJECTIONS to #3 Proposed Findings and Recommendations by Jessie Hill. (llg) |
Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jbh) |
Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Based on the #4 order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/24/2022. (jbh) |
Filing 4 ORDER adopting #3 Proposed Findings and Recommended Disposition; dismissing Plaintiff's Complaint without prejudice; directing Plaintiff to submit the statutory filing and administrative fee of $402.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 15 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 6/24/2022. (jbh) |
Filing 3 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS recommending #1 Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED without prejudice. If Plaintiff wishes to continue this case, he be required to submit the statutory filing and administrative fee of $402.00 to the Clerk, noting the above case style and number, within 15 days of the date of this Order, together with a motion to reopen the case. Upon receipt of the motion and full payment, the case will be reopened. The Court certifies, that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order adopting these recommendations and the accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Objections are to be received by the Clerk of this Court within 14 days of this Recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 06/03/2022. (lmc) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #1 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached to the docket in error (wrong image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added as an attachment to #1 docket entry and is attached hereto for service/review by the parties. (cmn) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Jessie Hill.(kdr) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/1/2022: #1 Main Document - Correct) (cmn). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.