Avery v. Hutchinson et al
| Robert Avery |
| Asa Hutchinson, Solomon Graves, Dexter Payne, Arkansas General Assembly, Richmond, Rice, Flippo and G Stubblefield |
| 4:2022cv00560 |
| June 13, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Dexter Payne served on 7/27/2022. (fjg) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Solomon Graves served on 7/27/2022. (fjg) |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Asa Hutchinson served on 8/3/2022. (fjg) |
| NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #7 Order. CORRECTION: The docket text was modified to remove duplicate text. (jak) |
| Summons Issued as to Solomon Graves, Asa Hutchinson, Dexter Payne and forwarded to U.S. Marshall for service. (ldb) |
Filing 7
ORDER dismissing the Arkansas General Assembly, Representative Richmond, Senator Rice, Senator G. Stubblefield, and Senator Flippo as Defendants; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Avery's Ex Post Facto Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and Due Process Clause claims; dismissing without prejudice Mr. Avery's request for a declaratory judgment that Act 1110 is a breach of his plea contract with the State of Arkansas; denying without prejudice Mr. Avery's embedded request for a temporary restraining order or preliminary injunction; directing the Clerk of Court to prepare summonses for Governor Asa Hutchinson, Secretary Solomon Graves, and Director Dexter Payne; directing the U.S. Marshal to serve a copy of #6 Amended Complaint, Summons, and this Order on Defendants Governor Hutchinson, Secretary Graves, and Director Payne; and certifying that an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 7/12/2022. (ldb) (Docket text modified on 7/14/2022 to remove duplicate text) (jak)
|
| Filing 6 AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Robert Avery.(kdr) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER directing the Clerk to reverse the consolidation of this case with Hayes v. Rutledge; granting #1 IFP application; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Wrightsville Unit, ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking Office, and the ADC Compliance Office; and directing Mr. Avery has 30 days to amend his Complaint. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 6/15/2022. (cmn)
|
| Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on #3 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Lee P. Rudofsky. (jak) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk of Court to transfer this case to the Honorable Lee P. Rudofsky. Further, this case should be consolidated with the master docket in Hayes v. Rutledge, et al., 4:21-cv-00347-LPR. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/15/2022. (jbh)
|
| Cases associated. Create association to 4:21-cv-00347-LPR. (jak) [REVERSED on 6/15/2022 pursuant to #5 Order.)(cmn) |
| Filing 2 PETITION for Declaratory Judgment and Temporary Injunction against All Defendants, filed by Robert Avery.(kdr) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert Avery. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
