Cases 1 - 10 of 106
Johnson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Cheyanne Clark, Mark Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Avery v. Sheriff Birk et al
as 2:2024cv04040
Plaintiff:
Robert Avery
Defendant:
Sheriff Birk and Steve Hiate
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shackleford v. Dejoy
as 24-204
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVE D. SHACKLEFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
LOUIS DEJOY, Mr., Postmaster General, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, USPS, GARY BARKSDALE, Mr., Inspector General and others
Shackleford v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2023cv01400
Plaintiff:
Dave D. Shackleford
Defendant:
Louis DeJoy, United States Postal Service, Gary Barksdale and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00556
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Naturalization Hearing
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Pachella v. Arivo Acceptance, LLC et al
as 7:2023cv01090
Plaintiff:
Stephen J. Pachella
Defendant:
Arivo Acceptance, LLC, Garff Enterprises Inc., Robert Avery and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Avery v. Griffin et al
as 4:2022cv01068
Plaintiff:
Robert Avery
Defendant:
Rory Griffin, Jessica Jackson Breedlove, Stringfellow Dentistry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01174
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
