Dillard v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Aaron Dillard |
Arkansas Department of Correction and Does Medical Staff, Sgt, Guard Captain, Duty Officers at Brickeys Unit |
4:2022cv01134 |
November 21, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Jerome T Kearney |
Billy Roy Wilson |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER granting #1 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to forward a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Pulaski County Detention Center; directing the Plaintiff to identify by name the Captain and Sergeant referred to in Plaintiff's Complaint within 30 days of the date of this Order; directing the Plaintiff to submit an Amended Complaint for the Court's review within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, if he wishes; and directing the Clerk of the Court to mail Plaintiff a blank 42 U.S.C. 1983 Complaint form. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 11/23/2022. (ldb) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by Aaron Dillard.(kdr) |
Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Aaron Dillard. (kdr) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.