Bolton v. Hanes et al
| James L Bolton |
| Hanes, Jacobs, Thomas and Blackmon |
| 4:2023cv00047 |
| January 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Edie R Ervin |
| D P Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (jak) |
| Filing 5 JUDGMENT: Bolton's complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/2/2023. (jak) |
Filing 4
ORDER withdrawing the reference. Plaintiff's complaint will be dismissed without prejudice. An in forma pauperis appeal from this Order and accompanying Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 3/2/2023. (jak)
|
|
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER-PLAINTIFFS denying #1 motion for leave to proceed IFP; directing the Clerk to enclose a new IFP application along with a copy of this Order; and directing Plaintiff to return a completed IFP application, including an accompanying affidavit and jail account information sheet, or pay the $402.00 filing fee, within 30 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Edie R. Ervin on 1/20/2023. (jbh)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by James L Bolton. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James L Bolton. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
