Robertson v. Davis et al
| Bobby Lee Robertson |
| Donna Davis, Cynthia Conway, Gill, Shalia McDowell, Lee, James Shipman, Maurice Colclager and William Straughn |
| 4:2023cv00494 |
| May 26, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Patricia S Harris |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 OBJECTION to #3 Order by Bobby Lee Robertson. (kdr) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONER PLAINTIFFS granting #1 IFP motion; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's institutional account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to the Warden of the Cummins Unit, the ADC Trust Fund Centralization Bank Office, and the ADC Compliance Office and a blank 1983 form to Robertson; and ordering Robertson to use this form to file an amended complaint. In the event he fails to file an amended complaint conforming to this order within 30 days, the Court may dismiss some or all of his claims for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Patricia S. Harris on 05/31/2023. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Bobby Lee Robertson. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Bobby Lee Robertson. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
