Hartman v. Sherwood, City of
| Jamie Hartman and Jamie Michaels |
| Sherwood Arkansas, City of |
| 4:2023cv00511 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Lee P Rudofsky |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Mark K. Cameron on behalf of Sherwood Arkansas, City of (Cameron, Mark) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand by Sherwood Arkansas, City of.(Eddings, Khayyam) |
| Filing 4 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. Based on 3 Order, the Clerk's office has reassigned the case to Judge Kristine G. Baker. (jak) |
Filing 3
(This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER: This case appears to be intimately related to case 4:21-cv-00974-KGB. Accordingly, for purpose of judicial economy, the Court transfers the case to Judge Baker's docket. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 6/13/2023. (hml)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER ON AMICUS BRIEFS. Signed by Judge Lee P. Rudofsky on 3/21/2023. (ldb)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand filed by Jamie Hartman against Sherwood Arkansas, City of. (Fee $ 402, Receipt Number LIT2386.) Summons issued and returned to counsel. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
