Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00511
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Scott v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
James Randy Scott
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of, Stephen Cobb and Sheila Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Ward v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2022cv00477
Plaintiff:
Robert Ward
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of, Matt Harris, Jacqueline Schichtl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv00974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dade et al v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2016cv00602
Plaintiff:
Charles Dade , Nakita Lewis , Nikki Petree and others
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of , Pulaski County Arkansas and Milas H Hale, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Manek et al
as 4:2016cv00218
Plaintiff:
Fabian Lewis, Jr
Defendant:
Clifford Manek, Zachary Milligan, Andy Kurez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jayroe v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of et al
as 4:2014cv00247
Plaintiff:
Donna Jayroe
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of , Sherwood Police Department , Scott Glidewell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2010cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
William G Tack and Joan B Tack Family Trust v. Sherwood Arkansas, City of
as 4:2009cv00515
Plaintiff:
William G Tack and Joan B Tack Family Trust and William G Tack and Joan B Tack Family Trust
Defendant:
Sherwood Arkansas, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
