Hopkins v. Higgins et al
| James Lewis Hopkins |
| Eric Higgins, Holmes, D Green, M Green, C Green, C Moseley and Rembly |
| 4:2023cv00999 |
| October 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Benecia B Moore |
| J Thomas Ray |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Lewis Hopkins. (ldb) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT. The Clerk's office has reassigned the referral of this case to Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore. Signed at the direction of the Court on 11/2/2023.(jak) |
Filing 3
INITIAL ORDER FOR PRO SE PRISONERS denying #1 IFP motion; directing the Clerk to send plaintiff a blank IFP motion; if plaintiff wishes to proceed with the case they must within 30 days of this Order either pay the $402 filing fee or file a complete IFP motion; and directing detention officials to assist Plaintiff in completing the necessary forms. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 10/24/2023. (jak)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants, filed by James Lewis Hopkins. (ldb) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James Lewis Hopkins. (ldb) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
