Watson v. Sims et al
Plaintiff: Trauoves Deshan Watson
Defendant: T Sims, Isom, D Dunn and Andrew D Isom
Case Number: 4:2023cv01143
Filed: November 29, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas
Presiding Judge: James M Moody
Referring Judge: Joe J Volpe
Nature of Suit: Prison Condition: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2024 Filing 23 SUMMONS Returned Executed. Andrew D Isom served on 12/27/2023. (ajj)
January 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 22 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for order #21 . Defendant Isom has been served and counsel has entered an appearance. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/24/2024. (lej)
January 24, 2024 Filing 21 MOTION for Status by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (ldb)
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 20 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER pursuant to the information provided in the answer (Doc. 18), the Clerk shall change Defendant's name to Andrew D. Isom. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/19/2024. (lej)
January 19, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 19 INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 7/19/2024. Dispositive motions due by 8/19/2024. Dispositive motions on the issue of exhaustion due by 3/19/2024. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 1/19/2024. (lej)
January 18, 2024 Filing 18 ANSWER to #2 Complaint by Isom.(Cryer, Christine)
January 11, 2024 Filing 17 NOTICE, CONSENT AND REFERENCE to a Magistrate Judge forwarded by the Clerk of Court. (lej)
January 11, 2024 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Christine Ann Cryer on behalf of Isom (Cryer, Christine)
January 3, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER approving and adopting, in its entirety, #10 Partial Recommendation as this Court's findings in all respects; allowing Plaintiff to proceed with his Eighth Amendment claim that Defendant Isom, in his personal capacity, failed to prevent the 08/04/2023 attack; dismissing, without prejudice, all other claims in the Complaint, as well as Defendants Sims and Dunn; and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge James M. Moody Jr. on 01/03/2024. (llg)
December 28, 2023 Filing 14 NOTICE OF DOCKET CORRECTION re #2 Complaint. CORRECTION: The original document was attached in error (incomplete image file) due to a clerical mistake by the Clerk's office. The correct document was added to docket entry #2 and is attached hereto for review by the parties. (jak)
December 26, 2023 Filing 13 OBJECTIONS to #10 Partial Recommended Disposition by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (llg)
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for status #11 . The Clerk shall mail a docket sheet to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/14/2023. (lej)
December 14, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION for Status by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (llg)
December 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 PARTIAL RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that Plaintiff be allowed to proceed with his Eighth Amendment claim that Defendant Isom, in his personal capacity, failed to prevent the 8/4/2023 attack. All other claims in the complaint as well as Defendants Sims and Dunn be dismissed without prejudice. The Court certify, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from an order adopting this recommendation would not be taken in good faith. Objections due no later than 14 days from the date of this recommendation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/12/2023. (lej)
December 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting Plaintiff's IFP Application #1 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of this order to the MSU Warden, ADC Trust Bank, and ADC Compliance Office. The Clerk shall prepare a summons and the USMS shall serve Defendant ISOM without prepayment of fees and costs or security therefor. The Clerk shall mail Plaintiff a copy of the docket sheet as requested in his Notification (Doc. 7.). Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/12/2023. (lej)
December 12, 2023 Summons Issued as to Isom and forwarded to U.S. Marshal for service. (ldb)
December 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER granting Plaintiff's motion for order #7 . The Clerk shall mail a copy of the docket sheet to Plaintiff. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 12/8/2023. (lej)
December 8, 2023 Filing 7 NOTIFICATION by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (llg)
November 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 (This is a TEXT ENTRY ONLY. There is no pdf document associated with this entry.) ORDER denying Plaintiff's motion to subpoena documents #3 . Discovery requests and responses are not to be filed with the Court but, instead, should be sent directly to opposing counsel, along with a certificate of service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(d) (providing that "the following discovery requests and responses must not be filed until they are used in the proceeding or the court orders filing: (i) depositions, (ii) interrogatories, (iii) requests for documents or to permit entry upon the land, and (iv) requests for admissions."); See also Local Rule 5.5(c)(2)(stating that "[a]ny party proceeding pro se shall be expected to be familiar with and follow the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure."). In contrast, motions to compel and/or for sanctions, pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, and any necessary attachments will be accepted for filing. Plaintiff shall wait until counsel enters an appearance and make his request to counsel at that time. The motion to appoint counsel is denied #4 . A civil litigant does not have a constitutional or statutory right to appointed counsel in a civil action but the Court may appoint counsel at its discretion. 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(1). The Court has considered Plaintiff's need for an attorney, the likelihood that Plaintiff will benefit from assistance of counsel, the factual complexity of the case, the Plaintiff's ability to investigate and present the case, and the complexity of the legal issues. In considering these factors, the Court finds that Plaintiff's claims do not appear legally or factually complex, and it appears Plaintiff is capable of prosecuting these claims without appointed counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe J. Volpe on 11/30/2023. (lej)
November 29, 2023 Filing 5 LETTER to the Court by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (ldb)
November 29, 2023 Filing 4 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (ldb)
November 29, 2023 Filing 3 MOTION to Subpoena Documents by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (ldb)
November 29, 2023 Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (ldb) (Additional attachment(s) added on 12/28/2023: #1 Main Document - Correct) (jak).
November 29, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Trauoves Deshan Watson. (ldb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Watson v. Sims et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Trauoves Deshan Watson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: T Sims
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Isom
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: D Dunn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew D Isom
Represented By: Christine Ann Cryer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?