Cases 1 - 10 of 648
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Isom, Jr. v. General Motors, LLC
as 1:2025cv00672
Plaintiff:
John Robert Isom, Jr.
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Apodaca (PS) v. Rynek et al
as 1:2025cv00665
Plaintiff:
Steven Angelo Apodaca
Defendant:
Marcus Rynek, Brian Weaver, Fagrelius Clark and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Isom v. LaGrand et al
as 3:2025cv00068
Plaintiff:
Aaron Isom
Defendant:
Kara LaGrand, Starlin Gentry, Paul Malay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv00089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
United States of America v. Isom
as 3:2025cv00030
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Racquel Isom
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Isom v. UC Health Systems et al
as 3:2025cv00012
Plaintiff:
Tamatha D. Isom
Defendant:
UC Health Systems and UC Health Poudre Valley Hospital
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2025cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Isom v. Patel et al
as 4:2025cv00003
Plaintiff:
Tamatha D. Isom
Defendant:
Bharat Patel and Super 8 Motel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. The State of Texas et al et al
as 4:2024cv01271
Defendant:
Marisela Rodriguez, Michael Tipsord doing business as State Farm CEO, Pamela Schoch doing business as Attorney of Records and others
Plaintiff:
Demetrius Lamar Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
