Cases 1 - 10 of 603
Isom Jr. et al v. Village of Dolton et al
as 1:2024cv03236
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Isom Jr., Elite Clientele LLC and Isom and Sole Inc.
Defendant:
Village of Dolton, Mayor Tiffany Henyard, Inspector Kim Alston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. American Airlines et al
as 2:2024cv00641
Plaintiff:
Rodney Dwayne Lawson
Defendant:
American Airlines, Robert Isom, David Seymour and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Rogers v. Unknown Officers
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Isom D Rogers, III
Defendant:
Unknown Officers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ISOM v. NELSON
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
TYESHA ISOM
Defendant:
JANE NELSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Walton v. City of St Louis Justice Center et al
as 4:2024cv00299
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Walton
Defendant:
City of St Louis Justice Center, Dr. Daniel Isom, II and J. Clemons-Abdullah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Humphrey et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv01455
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Humphrey, Alex Isom, Samuel Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Shelby Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salaverria v. American Airlines Group et al
as 3:2024cv00374
Plaintiff:
Alex Alfonso Salaverria, II
Defendant:
American Airlines Group, Majorie Powell, Doug Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ISOM v. USA
as 1:2024cv00102
Petitioner:
BENNY LYNN ISOM
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
