Flennoy v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
| Jimmie Lee Flennoy |
| Arkansas Department of Corrections, Woolfolk, Britney Carter, Karen D Whatley, Justin Brown and Katie Crawford |
| 4:2024cv00213 |
| March 6, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Billy Roy Wilson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 APPELLATE FILING FEE NOTICE to Plaintiff. (llg) |
Filing 4
JUDGMENT: Based on #3 Order entered today, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 03/20/2024. (llg)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #1 request to proceed in forma pauperis; directing monthly payments be made from Plaintiff's prison trust account for the $350 filing fee; directing the Clerk of Court to send a copy of this Order to the Administrator of the Pulaski County Detention Center; dismissing, without prejudice, #2 Complaint; and certifying an in forma pauperis appeal of this dismissal would be frivolous and would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge Billy Roy Wilson on 03/20/2024. (llg)
|
| Filing 2 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Jimmie Lee Flennoy. (llg) |
| Filing 1 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jimmie Lee Flennoy. (llg) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
