Cases 1 - 10 of 2,059
Pearson v. Wellpath Medical Services et al
as 3:2024cv00149
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Wellpath Medical Services and Hurst
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lynn Pearson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Cummins Unit et al
as 4:2024cv00699
Defendant:
Kara Snow, Cummins Unit, Kayla Hargrave and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cardell Hunes v. Dexter Payne
as 24-2645
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Petitioner:
Cardell Hunes
Fielding Kimery v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2606
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction, Marshall Dale Reed, Chief Deputy Director, ADC/DOC, James Gibson, Warden, Varner/Varner Supermax and others
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Fred Williams v. Dexter Payne
as 24-2592
Plaintiff:
Fred L. Williams
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Kimery v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00652
Defendant:
Aundrea Culclager, Doe, Marshal Dale Reed and others
Plaintiff:
Fielding Vaughn Kimery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cleveland Evans v. Wendy Kelley
as 24-2496
Petitioner:
Cleveland Evans
Respondent:
Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Sanders Carter v. Dexter Payne
as 24-2371
Petitioner:
Sanders McDaniel Carter
Respondent:
Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
Cummings v. Arkansas Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2024cv00506
Defendant:
Arkansas Department of Corrections, Lewis Young, Gary Musselwhite and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Foots v. Kopp et al
as 2:2024cv00105
Defendant:
Kopp and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Dontavian Marquis Foots
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
