Hughes v. Richards et al
| Brian RaMon Hughes |
| Haynes, Caffey, Brown, L Malone, L Davis, Beck, Marilyn Richards, Wellpath LLC and Seaster |
| 4:2024cv00261 |
| March 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Kristine G Baker |
| Edie R Ervin |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Case electronically transferred in from the U.S. District Court, Western District of Arkansas; Case Number 5:24-cv-05069. Electronic file copy of transfer order, case file, and docket sheet received. |
Filing 3
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE to District of Eastern District of Arkansas, Central Division. Docket Sheet and case documents sent to receiving court. Signed by Honorable Christy D. Comstock on March 21, 2024. (tg) [Transferred from arwd on 3/21/2024.]
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis (42:1983) by Brian Ramon Hughes. Motions referred to Christy D. Comstock.(tg) [Transferred from arwd on 3/21/2024.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT REFERRED (42:1983) against Beck, Brown, Caffey, L. Davis, Haynes, L. Malone, Marilyn Richards, Seaster, Wellpath, LLC, Medical Service Provider, filed by Brian Ramon Hughes.(tg) [Transferred from arwd on 3/21/2024.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
