Smith v. Griswold et al
| Joseph J Smith |
| Griswold, Roland Anderson, Correctional Medical Services, Arkansas Department of Correction, Mark Cashion, Ronald Dobbs, Karen Holman and Dawson |
| 5:2007cv00198 |
| July 27, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Chicot |
| Jerry W. Cavaneau |
| William R. Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
102
JUDGMENT re 101 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing case with prejudice as to the Arkansas Dept of Correction and without prejudice to all other defts; and certifying that an ifp appeal from its Orders and this Judgment would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Judge William R. Wilson, Jr on 3/23/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
98
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION that Deft Griswold's motion for summary judgment 43 be GRANTED; Defts Anderson's and CMS' motion for summary judgment 49 be GRANTED; Pltf's case be DISMISSED in its entirety and al l pending motions be DENIED AS MOOT; and, the Court certify that an ifp appeal from any order and judgment adopting this recommendation would not be taken in good faith; Objections to R&R due by 3/18/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerry W. Cavaneau on 3/4/09. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
