Ricks v. Adams et al
| James E Ricks, Jr |
| Ed Adams, Hunter, J Jackson and Joshua King |
| 5:2008cv00055 |
| February 28, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| Jerry W. Cavaneau |
| William R. Wilson |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
127
ORDER administratively closing this case and allowing plaintiff to file a motion to re-open this action upon deft King's ability to attend a trial in this District. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 8/16/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
121
ORDER granting 110 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by defendant Mike Hurst. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 1/22/10. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
108
ORDER denying 106 Motion to Compel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 11/10/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 83 Motion to Stay; granting in part and denying in part 84 Motion to Amend/Correct to the extent that such a stay shall be applied only to deft King; and granting 85 Motion to Quash. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 7/23/09. (bkp)
|
|
Filing
78
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 51 Motion for Summary Judgment and dismissing defts Randle and Royal from plaintiff's complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge Henry L. Jones, Jr on 2/27/09. (bkp)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
