Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 640
Rodriguez v. Albonico, et al.
as 24-7528
Defendant: D. COX, CRADDOCK, N. ALBONICO and others
Plaintiff: DAVID ARNOLD RODRIGUEZ
Jackson v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00484
Plaintiff: Kennon J Jackson
Defendant: Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. Agadjani et al
as 1:2024cv07700
Defendant: Maksud Agadjani, TRAXNYC Corp., Yashu Sean Kumar and others
Plaintiff: Curtis J. Jackson, III and NYC Vibe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv07638
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e-2e Job Discrimination (Unlawful Employment Practices)
Jackson v. McDonough
as 24-2339
Respondent: DENIS MCDONOUGH, Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Claimant: CHARLIE J. JACKSON
JACKSON v. SAMPSON et al
as 4:2024cv00116
Respondent: WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN ANGELA REAVES and GEORGIA, STATE OF
Petitioner: MALCOLM J JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JACKSON v. SAMPSON We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2024cv00113
Respondent: WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON
Petitioner: MALCOLM J JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Billy J. Jackson v. Pfizer, Inc.
as 5:2024cv01616
Plaintiff: Billy J. Jackson, Jr.
Defendant: Pfizer, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Marques Tavron v. Dexter Payne, et al
as 24-2275
Defendant: White, W/M, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, B. King, Sgt., E.A.R.M.U., ADC, Kentara Coleman, C.O., E.A.R.M.U., ADC and others
Plaintiff: Marques Tavron
Jackson v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00929
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff: Sarah J. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?