Cases filed in Tennessee
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Zabielski et al v. The H.T. Hackney Co, Inc et al
as 4:2018cv00033
Plaintiff: Thomas M Zabielski and Deborah Zabielski
Defendant: The H.T. Hackney Co Inc , Emery J Jackson, John Doe Corporation I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Administrative Proceedings File No. 2:18-1803212000-01 v. Bartlett City Court et al
as 2:2018mc00023
Respondent: Bartlett City Court, Bartlett Police Department, B. Luff and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2016cv00232
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Derrick J Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Dunn v. Gray et al (RHC) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00033
Plaintiff: Joshua Dunn
Defendant: James Gray and J Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunn v. Gray et al
as 3:2015mc00025
Plaintiff: Joshua Dunn
Defendant: James Gray, J Jackson, Erwin and others
Milam v. Southaven Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2015cv02029
Plaintiff: Tina L. Milam
Defendant: Southaven Police Department, Todd Samples, Baptist Memorial Hospital Desoto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brewer et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv02382
Plaintiff: John C. Brewer , Linda Brewer , Jackie E. Bridgmon and others
Defendant: Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA, Inc.
Miscellaneou: Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. USA
as 1:2013cv00006
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Derrick J Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2007cv00185
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Charles J Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Jackson v. Cross
as 4:2007cv00034
Plaintiff: Ginger J Jackson
Defendant: Paul D Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?