Jones v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
Larry Wayne Jones |
Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Yolanda Clark and Does |
5:2008cv00195 |
July 17, 2008 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Prison Condition: Civil Rights Office |
Lincoln |
Brian S. Miller |
H. David Young |
Plaintiff |
Federal Question |
42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 76 ORDER directing the Director of ADC to collect the $455 appellate filing fee from plaintiff's prison trust account and send payment to the clerk of the Court; directing the Clerk of the Court to send a copy of this Order to the Warden, Varner Super Max Unit, P.O. Box 400, Grady, AR 71644-0400 and to the ADC Trust Fund Centralized Banking and Compliance Offices. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 2/24/10. (bkp) |
Filing 55 JUDGMENT re 54 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations and dismissing complaint with prejudice. Signed by Judge Brian S. Miller on 4/13/09. (bkp) |
Filing 50 PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS that Defts' 35 MOTION for Summary Judgment be GRANTED and Pltf's 2 Complaint be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; the Court certify that an ifp appeal taken from the Order and Judgment dismissing this action is considered frivolous and not in good faith; Objections to R&R due by 4/6/2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge H. David Young on 3/23/09. (vjt) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.