Andrews v. Norris et al
| Roland Andrews |
| Larry Norris, John Does, Arkansas, State of and Arkansas Department of Correction |
| 5:2009cv00366 |
| November 18, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lee |
| J. Thomas Ray |
| Susan Webber Wright |
| Plaintiff |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER adopting 4 Report and Recommendations in their entirety; therefore, this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted; dismissal of this action constitutes a "strike" pursuant to 28 USC 1915(g); judgment will be entered accordingly. Signed by Judge Susan Webber Wright on 1/4/10. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
4
PROPOSED FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDED DISPOSITION recommending that Pursuant to the screening function mandated by 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, this § 1983 action be DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE, for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted; recommending that dismissal of this action CONSTITUTE a "strike," as defined by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and recommending the Court CERTIFY, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3), that an in forma pauperis appeal from any Order and Judgment adopting this Recommended Disposition would not be taken in good faith. Objections to R&R due due 11 days from the date of the findings and recommendations. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 11/24/09. (hph)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
