Mayberry v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Edward Eugene Mayberry, Jr |
| Arkansas Department of Correction, Ray Hobbs, Lymon, Kitchens and McCormick |
| 5:2010cv00307 |
| October 21, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Jefferson |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT pursuant to 26 Order Adopting Report and Recommendations entered this date, judgment is hereby entered in favor of defts dismissing all claims in this action with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 5/29/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER re 22 , 23 Plaintiff is directed to file a Response to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgments and a separate Statement of Disputed Facts on or before 04/14/2012. Defendants, may choose to file a Reply within 7 days of the filing of the Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Thomas Ray on 04/03/2012. (kcs)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER granting defts' request to extend the deadline for filing dispositive motions; Dispositive Motions due by 3/30/2012. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 2/29/12. (vjt)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL, defts Lymon, Kitchens, and McCormick are dismissed without prejudice due to lack of service; the Court certifies that an ifp appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith. Signed by Chief Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/19/11. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
