Cole v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| Albert Lynn Cole |
| Demery, Arkansas Department of Correction and Ray Hobbs |
| 5:2011cv00232 |
| September 7, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| J. Leon Holmes |
| Other Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
30
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the Court's 29 Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, judgment is entered dismissing this case with prejudice. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 8/7/2012. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
29
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW rejecting Mr. Cole's claim for punitive damages and that Officer Demery did not violate the requirements of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments. In the alternative, the Court concludes that Officer Demery is entitled to qualified immunity. A judgment for deft Officer Demery will be entered separately. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 7/24/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 8 Motion for Summary Judgment. The motion is granted as to plaintiff's claims against the ADC and Ray Hobbs and denied as to the claims against Officer Demery in his individual capacity. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 6/29/12. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER granting defts' 12 Motion to File Under Seal Exhibit E to defts' motion for summary judgment. Signed by Judge Kristine G. Baker on 5/23/12. (vjt)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
