Hay et al v. Arkansas Department of Correction et al
| DeMarico Jamond Hay and Donte Chambers |
| Keishaundra Malone, Lyndon Cordell Allen, Varner Unit, Daryl Gardner, Joe Page, III and Arkansas Department of Correction |
| 5:2012cv00462 |
| December 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
| Pine Bluff Office |
| Lincoln |
| Jerome T. Kearney |
| D. P. Marshall |
| Prison Condition: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
18
JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 17 Order entered in this case, Hay's 1 Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 5/15/2013. (dmn)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER directing plaintiff to provide to the Court a current address by 4/19/13, or the Court will dismiss the complaint without prejudice. 9 , 10 . Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 4/4/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER re 10 Mail Returned. Plaintiff shall notify this Court of his current address and his intent to continue prosecution within 30 days of the date of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 4/2/13. (kpr)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER re 2 Order Directing plaintiffs to either file the $350 filing fee or an application to proceed ifp. Donte Chambers is dismissed from the complaint without prejudice for his failure to prosecute. Signed by Judge D. P. Marshall Jr. on 2/21/13. (kpr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
