McArty v. Arkansas, State of et al
Randall T McArty |
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, William Straughn, Steve Outlaw, Williams, Callaway, Adkins, Katina Owens, D Cook and Jenkins |
5:2014cv00037 |
February 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas |
Pine Bluff Office |
Hot Spring |
J. Leon Holmes |
Jerome T. Kearney |
Prison Condition |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 70 JUDGMENT: Pursuant to the 69 Order entered in this matter on this date, it is Considered, Ordered and Adjudged that this case be, and it is hereby, DISMISSED. The relief sought is denied. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 4/29/2015. (ks) |
Filing 59 ORDER directing the Defendants to provide the information requested within this Order within fifteen days. Ruling on the Summary Judgment Motion will be held in abeyance, pending receipt of such information. Signed by Magistrate Judge Jerome T. Kearney on 3/13/2015. (jak) |
Filing 22 ORDER adopting 6 Proposed Findings and Recommendations in their entirety. Defendants State of Arkansas, Arkansas Department of Correction, Owens, Cook,and Jenkins are DISMISSED from this action, with prejudice, for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's allegations of ADC policy violations are DISMISSED for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Signed by Judge J. Leon Holmes on 6/23/2014. (ks) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Arkansas Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.